First off, thank you for voting for
my tweet for the tweet of the week contest! As Abraham Lincoln once said, “a
good pun can help you win a Twitter contest.”
Anyway, the organization I chose is
one close to my heart: the YMCA of Central and Northern Westchester’s Strong
Kids campaign. For the past four years I have volunteered and worked at Camp
Combe, a day camp with a twist: its programs were designed by a child
psychologist to encourage positive character building and life skills. Also,
the camp is an “inclusion camp” that supports children with autism, behavioral
issues, and other special needs, integrating them as part of the normal camp
activities, not as an isolated group. Counselors and staff like myself are trained
extensively by an amazing staff on how to employ these character building and
inclusion techniques. For example, we are trained in positive reinforcement
that builds campers’ self-confidence rather than traditional discipline that diminishes
their hope in themselves. As a result of a close-knit staff and extreme
dedication, hundreds of campers’ lives’ are impacted positively every summer. I’ve
personally seen many children with persistent behavioral or neurological issues
develop social skills and confidence that I don’t imagine they could have found
anywhere else. All of this is thanks to a staff composed of many volunteering
or minimally-paid teenagers and adults who have share a strong sense of mission.
The camp is part of the YMCA, which
also provides many invaluable services year-round to the community. We’ve
talked about youth services in our class, so I think that everyone reading this
post has an idea of how important youth programs like the YMCA and Camp Combe
are, especially for children of lower income. As argued extensively in A Path Appears, philanthropy is most
effective when targeted at early stages of development. Many children who
attend the camp have the means to afford such a positive summer experience, yet
many do not. Normally, these kids would be part of the lower-income group that
is at a disadvantage to their wealthier peers. However, the Strong Kids
campaign enables lower-income children to participate in character enriching
experiences at the YMCA and Camp Combe.
I assume that Peter Singer would be
fuming right now, as the small amount of money I’m donating will only partially
fund a child’s camp experience, while it might be able to save an impoverished
child from disease elsewhere. I fully realize Singer’s argument and have admittedly
questioned my decision. However, this is a cause that I am close to and believe
can have an enormous impact on a child. I believe that sometimes, we must
follow our hearts in donating, not only our rational side. I’ve spent years
working at this camp and hope to continue making a difference there. Likewise, I
will continue to remain engaged in issues of global poverty. I don’t think philanthropy
should be an either/or situation, rather a mix of rational and emotional giving
and local and global need.
I really enjoyed reading your post! The YMCA and Camp Combe seem like organizations that do a lot of good and can have a significant impact on children's lives from an early stage. I agree with your argument that we can't always follow Peter Singer's effective altruism approach to philanthropy, because we often have emotional connections to causes and are more likely to give to organizations we have worked with or seen firsthand the positive impacts of. However, reading articles and The Most Good You Can Do by Singer has made me think more about where the investment of time/money can make the biggest difference. In ch. 12 of Most Good, Singer discusses the "difficult comparisons" that must be made when deciding what cause to support. While some objective methods for making these kinds of decisions are discussed (QALYs and DALYs), these comparisons often "won't tell us whose fate is most worth changing." Overall, I think that while each dollar might go farther to fulfill a fundamental need such as feeding a starving child, any giving is good and giving to causes we are passionate about instead is not necessarily a bad decision.
ReplyDeleteCongratulations Caleb on your recent win for tweet of the week! The pun was great, and I am going to install the app and explore it more on my devices. I love how you addressed Singer’s conflicts in relation to your donation, as I too had felt I would need to justify my decision to donate to a camp in a similar way.
ReplyDeleteFor me, it is challenging to weigh the benefits between the impact of donating abroad versus donating locally and potentially not having as wide of an effect. The difference between wide and deep impacts has really been something on my mind this week. In going abroad for a mission’s trip, I really witnessed how much help we can provide with even a limited amount of money. Yet still, I don’t see myself ever working in a career strictly to generate the most income for charity. For me, I really do like to be thoughtful and have some heart in the organization still. Of course, I still think that people who chose to be effective altruists in this way are very commendable, but I don't think that we are all obligated to do this. I love that you too agree that our heart really does influence how we provide either time or money to an organization. I heart is also present in our decisions so far as many of us nominated organizations that we have familiarity with for the grant. I also think that using careers as a way to generate income for charities is interesting when we consider how people like Kennedy Odede and Carolina's work with teen moms in Columbia have made an impact working as leaders of their organizations in A Path Appears. I’m looking forward to our conversation in class regarding the careers chapter in Singer’s book today.
Caleb, I've had a similar experience growing up as well. I used to work as a camp counselor at my YMCA. Except the kids I was supervising didn't have any social disorders. However, I can still empathize about all the hard work you put in with your kids.
ReplyDeleteIt's extremely difficult dealing with kids with no noticeable social problems so I can't imagine the difficulty you went though. Your philanthropic contribution to your community is huge. You helped these children feel comfortable with themselves while building relationships with their peers. I believe this type of work will impact these children for years to come.
Providing emotion support for our youth-in-need is an investment into the future. You only had a small amount of money to give and you gave it all to an organization which invests into these children's future. Singer wrote about a percentage of income which, he believes, should be donated to charity. You gave 100% of the money you were given away. I believe Peter Singer would very proud of your contribution.
Also I really enjoyed the pun, its a lost comedic art form and you nailed it.